|
In 2007, DCO became an Energy Star Partner where it committed its Executive Management team to initially develop proper metrics to benchmark its energy consumption tracking progress and then set the goal of reducing its energy consumption by 25% in 5 years.
By participating as an elite member of the Energy Star Partners program, DCO can leverage the knowledge from those businesses in different industries that have managed successful energy reduction programs.
In today's business, we cannot afford to focus only on profits. We therefore feel that sustainability can support our healthy financial performance along with the company's leadership and development in strategic economic, social, and environmental programs surpassing industry standards.
See below the DCO Sustainability Strategy 2006-2008. In January of 2009, Tupelo plant signed contract with TVA on the
Green Power Switch® program. The impact on our Operations will be a
reduction of over 360 tons of CO2 emissions in the Tupelo plant
alone - compared with the current 532 tons we have reduced since
2006 for both plants. This achievement is possible with 5% of the
plant’s electricity purchased as green power and at a premium.

Energy Consumption – Absolute: Our energy consumption and the breakdown of their consumption by type will be monitored and benchmarked in our facilities in Tupelo and Sparta which represent approximately over 800,000 square feet of manufacturing space dealing with over 300 suppliers. YTD 08 vs. 07 showed an increase of 16%, mainly due to rate
increases from utility company.
|
Environmental Impact from Electric & Natural Gas Energy Consumption- The calculated emissions from energy consumed in pounds of CO2 emitted by natural gas and electric energy. The 08 vs. 07 showed a slight decrease of approximately 1%. A
total of 532 tons of CO2 have been reduced from Operations since
2006.

((Key Performance Indicators – KPIs: Cost of Energy per Unit of Production - Prior to 2008, the energy data did not use the same KPI denominator (units). Sparta facility included fully-completed units (fixtures) and excluded component parts, while Tupelo included all fixtures and component parts as their units. This discrepancy was addressed in 2008 when monthly tracking efforts were initiated for both plants in 2008.))

The calculations show an overall increase of 9% in the total
amount of energy consumed per unit of production from 2007 to 2008
mainly due to a reduction in the overall units. Aggregate energy
intensity for 2008 in kBtu/total output was 19.99 vs. 18.31in 2007.

|